Just last weekend.

i was photo-copying my labbooks in NTU medical library, using the copy stand.

Things about music industry and online music retailing stuff comes up to my mind.

and there are some solutions to the online retailing problems.

But my english is quite poor, so i’m struggling to make my thoughts into words.

Though the solutions is not very profitable then before to the investor and to the company , i think.

However, it should do well to the customer and to the music culture preservation.

i would really like to share it on the internet, though i doubt the possibility of it going realistic.

I would post it once i got it right and once i put on the creative commons thing on the blog.

thanks

test

It’s a blog about intellectual property.

It’s maintained by a team of students at The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

http://intellectualproperty.wordpress.com/

我認為數位保存是一件非常重要的事。

任何在我們所住的地球上的所有東西都值得保存，古代的文物有歷史博物館保存他們，書籍有圖書館保存他們。

但是還有很多東西是還沒有被考慮保存的..

各種文化的內容、音樂、科技等

他們在人類文化中都有他們的地位，也絕對值得保存。

在現代科技的幫助下，當數位化之後，能夠保存的資料又更多了，利用數位化的保存，年限可以再提高，在適當的保存環境下，可以保存數十年到數百年，當然，數位化保存的目的是提供不一樣的保存方式，並不是鄙棄原本的方式，原本的內容，媒體也應以適當的方式保存，只是數位化提供了讓該物品保存下來更高的可能。

過去的智財保護跟現在很不一樣

當然，拷貝他人的作品加以販售而得私利者絕對是不能被接受的

但是如果是親友、網路上，沒有營利的一個前提下所散布的是不是也要接受處罰?

憑藉的是什麼原則呢?

因為我下載所以沒有去買，如此造成該營利機構的損失?

這樣來看似乎並不合理

各位的意見?

I know this is a blog, and i know a forum should run on a real internet forum program, but i’m just not yet ready to build one.
i’m using a academic internet which has limited my use.

so i’ll just use this blog as a way to discuss some stuff with all you guys.
also there will be some news regrading to intellectual property issues.

I really hope to hear from you guys about these issues.